Alternative Dispute Resolution
Litigation is not always the best solution, as it can become costly and is driven by a complex set of procedural rules that must be followed. Alternative Dispute Resolution, or ADR, provides other options. If for at least a period of time, both parties can agree that litigation is not a constructive way to resolve a dispute, that presents an opportunity for the ADR process. There are numerous forms of ADR; which is applicable typically depends on the situation. Our attorneys know the various ADR processes and can help you craft a forum for resolving your IP dispute that operates outside the regular constraints of the court system.
The benefits of ADR are numerous — why it is increasingly used and even formally integrated into the legal procedures that courts require litigants to follow. The main benefits of ADR are:
- Flexible Procedures — The process is controlled by the parties to the dispute.
- Lower Costs — Both parties save on costs that would otherwise be expended to comply with court procedures.
- Less Complexity — The rules for ADR are simpler than for matters in court.
- Expert Resolution — Parties have their choice of a neutral third party to facilitate a resolution, and they can select someone with expertise in the field. For complex IP matters, this ability to involve a qualified, neutral party is critical.
- Confidentiality — The matter can be kept out of the public record.
- Binding Outcomes — If the parties consent, the outcome is binding; durable agreements result.
The ADR process is rather straightforward:
Step 1. Select which ADR mechanism to utilize. The choices are:
- Negotiation: The parties resolve the dispute without legal counsel.
- Mediation: Legal counsel present the matter to a third party for a decision. In Collaborative Law, the attorneys for each side facilitate the resolution process.
- Arbitration: The matter is presented to an arbitrator, usually a retired judge or an expert in the field.
Step 2. Select the people best suited to resolve the dispute. In IP matters — inherently technical and complex — the choice of people involved in the ADR process is critical. Their technical background and experience play a key role in resolving the dispute with efficiency.
Step 3. Present the facts and legal arguments in the selected forum and work to agree upon a resolution to the matter.
The ITC: The Powerful Yet Underused Weapon In the War Against Infringement
We all know the story: a trademark, copyright or patent is infringed; the infringer is sued; and if all goes well, the owner of the intellectual property is made whole. Most people would end the story there. What many people aren’t aware of is that the ITC, the International Trade Commission, is another weapon in […]
Posted on October 2, 2014
Is an Ordinary Designer an Ordinary Observer?
High Point Design LLC v. Buyers Direct, Inc. The Federal Circuit, dealt with two different kinds of ordinary: the ordinary observer and the ordinary designer. Quiet clearly, the Federal Circuits, sees a difference between the two ordinary people. The judgment might however be incompatible with KSR ruling of the supreme court. Under Federal Circuit law, […]
Posted on September 26, 2014
The Death of Non-Compete Agreements in CA
Many employers prefer Employment Agreements that contain non-compete language. While often thought to be desirable by employers, in California the large majority of such contracts are no good. The view of the California Supreme Court is and has been that California Business & Professions Code 16600 unambiguously prohibits post-employment restrictions that limit an employee’s ability to […]
Posted on September 19, 2014